- If the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed is a regular faculty member in an academic department with a chair, then the immediate supervisor is the department chair. In most cases, the department chair is the immediate supervisor of a faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed.
- If the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed is a department chair, then the immediate supervisor is the Associate Provost for Program Support and Improvement.
- If the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed is a dean, then the immediate supervisor is the Provost.
Conditions for filing and handling grievances
The student must submit the academic grievance in writing to the immediate supervisor of the faculty member (as defined above). This grievance shall be submitted no later than thirty (30) class days from the date final grades were issued by the Registrar for the course in question. The grievance shall include statements of the grounds for the grievance, supporting evidence and suggested steps to resolve the matter. In the event the grievance is related to a final grade, one or more of the following conditions must be met for a formal grievance to be filed:
- The student shall provide written evidence that the assigned grade was based on arbitrary, unlawful, or non-academic criteria.
- The student shall provide written evidence that the assigned grade did not accurately reflect his or her fulfillment of course requirements and/or course policies, as stated in the course syllabus (for example, class attendance, grade standards, or penalty for late or incomplete work), or other applicable requirements of the University.
A copy of the grievance shall be given to the appropriate faculty member. Within ten (10) class days of the receipt of the written grievance, the immediate supervisor shall meet with the student and with the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed to review the matter. The immediate supervisor shall respond in writing to the student and the faculty member, indicating his or her decision and recommendations regarding the matter, within ten (10) class days of meeting with the student. In the event the formal grievance involves a course grade, the immediate supervisor may recommend that the faculty member change the grade, or that the faculty member review course and/or grading requirements and re-evaluate the grade accordingly, or the immediate supervisor may determine that there is insufficient evidence to support the grievance.
- Either the student or the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed may appeal in writing to the next appropriate administrator, provided the appropriate conditions are met (see “conditions for filing and handling appeals” below). The next appropriate administrator is determined as follows:
- If the grievance has first been submitted to a department chair, the written appeal shall be submitted to the Associate Provost for Program Support and Improvement.
- If the grievance has first been submitted to the Associate Provost for Program Support and Improvement, or if the grievance has been ruled upon by the Associate Provost for Program Support and Improvement and subsequently appealed by either the student or the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed, the written appeal shall be submitted to the Provost.
Conditions for filing and handling appeals
Either the student or the faculty member may appeal the decision of the immediate supervisor in writing to the next appropriate administrator who will render a decision in writing within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving the written notice of appeal. A copy of the appeal notice, which must include copies of the grievance and appealed decision shall be given to the party against whom the appeal has been filed, the immediate supervisor who heard the initial grievance, and (if applicable) any other appropriate administrator who has handled the appeal (e.g., a dean or the Provost). After reviewing the appeal notice and accompanying documents, this next appropriate administrator may summarily dismiss the appeal if he or she determines that the appeal clearly is without merit, or if he or she determines that the above-stated conditions for filing a grievance have not been satisfied. If the appeal is summarily dismissed by this administrator there is no further basis for appeal. If he or she has not summarily dismissed the appeal, he or she may meet with the student, faculty member, and/or appropriate administrators who heard the appeal previously to seek further information regarding the merits of the appeal and to assist in making his or her determination.
- In the event that an appeal has been ruled upon at the Provost level and has not been summarily dismissed by the Provost, either the student or the faculty member against whom the grievance has been filed may appeal the decision of the Provost in writing, to the Academic Leadership Team with a copy to the Provost. Following receipt of such appeal notice, if all previous steps of the formal grievance process have been taken, and the grievance has not been summarily dismissed, the Provost within thirty (30) calendar days, shall convene a meeting of the Academic Leadership Team which shall act as a review panel for the matter. The Academic Leadership Team shall request that Student Senate appoint two student participants and one alternate (to serve if one of the appointees has a conflict of interest or cannot otherwise attend) as ad hoc members for the sole purpose of hearing the appeal. Prior to the meeting, materials, including, but not limited to, the following, shall be distributed to members of the Academic Leadership Team: the student’s written grievance (a copy of which shall have been provided to the appropriate faculty member, department chair, Associate Provost for Program Support and Improvement, and Provost), and any evidence provided by the student in support of it, along with an account by the faculty member, presenting his or her decisions and rationale regarding the matter, and any pertinent information provided by the Provost including the communication regarding his or her decision concerning the resolution of the matter. Neither the Provost nor any other directly involved official shall have a vote in this proceeding, nor shall any such official participate in the meeting of the Academic Leadership Team concerning said appeal, unless called in as a resource person. Academic Leadership Team members who have a conflict of interest in the matter shall recuse themselves from the discussion and deliberations concerning such matter. Acting in its capacity as a review panel, the Academic Leadership Team is not empowered to change a grade given by a faculty member, or to force a faculty member to change a grade. In grievance cases related to a final grade, the Academic Leadership Team may take one of three actions:
- Recommend that the faculty member change the grade.
- Recommend that the faculty member review course and/or grading requirements and re-evaluate the grade accordingly.
- Deny any requested grade change.
The Academic Leadership Team will submit its recommendations in writing to the student, and to the faculty member, department chair, Associate Provost for Program Support and Improvement, and Provost within fifteen (15) calendar days of the above-described meeting of the Academic Leadership Team.
Integrity - Academic
Personal integrity is a behavioral expectation for all members of the Malone University community: faculty, staff, and students. We are called to personal integrity by the desire and obligation to model our lives after that of Jesus Christ. As noted in the biblical Principles underlying the statement of Malone University Community Responsibilities, “Love for and accountability to God are the primary motivation for Christian conduct.” Christ calls us in John 14:15 to keep his commandments and in Ephesians 5:8-9 we are reminded to walk as children of the light showing truth as a fruit of the Spirit. Academic integrity is that part of personal integrity which encompasses all activities in the learning process. It is the consistent demonstration of honorable behavior in all academic endeavors.
There are times, for example, when pressure to minimize work load, increase academic standing, or assist other students may lead to actions that breach academic integrity, and thereby personal integrity as well. Participation in academic activities and/or submission of academic work that includes any form of deception is an inappropriate response to that pressure. Appropriate resources for responding to this pressure are available by consulting with faculty.
Collaborative study endeavors are both permitted and encouraged under certain circumstances. However, it is essential for faculty, staff, and students to have a common understanding of the factors that distinguish acceptable and unacceptable academic behaviors. The list of examples given below describes situations in which academic integrity is not being maintained. It is provided to help clarify academic behaviors that must be avoided. While it does not constitute an exhaustive list, it is sufficiently comprehensive to inform even those students who might otherwise compromise academic integrity unintentionally, unconsciously or as a result of lack of knowledge.
- Exemplary, Non-Comprehensive Definitions and Explanations Regarding Unacceptable Academic Conduct
- Plagiarism 1
- submitting as one’s own work, part or all of an oral or written assignment which is copied, paraphrased, or purchased from another source, including world wide web and other online sources, without proper acknowledgement of that source. In written assignments, using three or more words in succession from a source without quotation marks and proper acknowledgement can be considered plagiarism.
- submitting as one’s own, course work which has been prepared or extensively revised by someone else
- allowing one’s work to be copied
- doing work for another student
- maintaining a file of papers with the intent that others may review them or use them for submission
- offering aid that differs from or exceeds that which is expressly approved by the instructor for any exam or course activity
- disseminating confidential information
- destroying educational resources and materials
- removing, destroying, or otherwise compromising the academic work of another student
- misrepresenting attendance or reason for absence
- using information or accepting aid which is not approved by the instructor; this may include but is not limited to
- using notes during a closed-book test
- soliciting information about the contents of an assignment or test
- looking at another student’s test paper during testing
- Responsibility to Inform Students
- Faculty members are responsible for clearly communicating the Academic Integrity Policy to students. This is accomplished through two primary methods:
- providing information about the policy, and about the importance of reading and understanding the policy, at the beginning of each course
- informing all incoming students of the policy through such vehicles as The College Experience course (GEN 100), freshman orientation, and orientation meetings for graduate and other non-traditional programs.
- Definition of Academic Integrity and/or reference to definition and explanation in the Catalog or Student Handbook. NOTE: If a faculty member’s definition of academic integrity differs in any way from that published in the Catalog or Student Handbook, the difference(s) must be clearly articulated in the syllabus.
- Examples of academic dishonesty specific to the course
- Explanations of the specific sanctions to be imposed. Sanctions could include a required rewrite of a plagiarized paper with a reduction of grade or failure of a test where cheating occurred. The maximum sanction available to be imposed by a faculty member is failure of the course. All incidents of infringements of academic integrity by an undergraduate student (including degree-completion students) are to be reported to the Provost or his designate who may take further action in the case of multiple infractions (section III. A.1. b.) and may consult with and advise the faculty member throughout the process.
- Reference to appeal process in Catalog
- Faculty should clearly and completely discuss the above information and encourage students to seek clarification concerning the policy on the first day of class and throughout the course.
- Malone University faculty members are responsible for taking steps to investigate suspected violations, and discussing the incident with the student(s) involved. Though this process may result in the decision to impose sanctions, faculty should approach it with the intent to manifest Christian love, seeking a balance of justice and grace, and demonstrating concern for the moral and intellectual development of the student(s).
- If a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy is suspected, the faculty member must meet with the student(s) to discuss the incident and determine to the faculty member’s satisfaction whether or not a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy has occurred.
- If a student is accused of violating academic integrity, but subsequently the faculty member determines that the student is innocent, or if insufficient evidence exists to justify further action, the student should be informed of this determination in writing. Appropriate confidentiality will be maintained with respect to documents and information related to the accusation.
- If the faculty member determines that a violation of academic integrity has occurred, a report should be filed with the Provost’s Office and a duplicate of the report provided to the student and the appropriate Department Chair/Program Director. The report should contain the following information:
- Complete description of incident
- Date of meeting with the student
- Conclusions reached as a result of the meeting
- Sanctions imposed
- Recommendations to the Provost regarding whether or not additional action should be taken
- Description of the appeals process available to the student or reference to this process as published in the Catalog or Student Handbook
- Student and faculty signatures and date indicating that the report has been delivered to the student
- Initial Involvement of the Provost
- After the submission of a faculty report in the Provost’s Office, the Provost may take either of the following actions:
- If no other reports exist, no appeal has been made, and the Provost deems that the faculty member’s corrective action was appropriate, the report will be filed within the office. If future reports are received pertaining to the same student, the Provost will then have access to previous reports and may choose to proceed to the step described in Subsection (b) below. The contents of this file will be purged based upon the established retention of records policy governing such reports 2 .
- If the Provost’s file indicates that the student has committed a serious violation of the Academic Integrity Policy, or that there have been multiple violations by said student, the Provost may submit a request for a hearing before the Academic Leadership Team concerning such violation(s). The purpose of this hearing is to determine whether additional University-level action is justified by the serious or repeated nature of academic integrity violations. Previous actions taken with regard to the student’s academic violation(s) will be upheld. If the Academic Leadership Team determines that a student’s record of violation(s) is of sufficient seriousness that action at the University level is warranted, then the Academic Leadership Team will take action to impact the student’s current and future status at Malone University, such as suspension or expulsion.
1 Confusion can arise in distinguishing between collaborative work and plagiarism. The following excerpt from The Writer’s Community (by David J. Klooster and Patricia L. Bloem, Martin’s Press, 1995) is intended to help resolve any potential misunderstandings:
“All good writing builds on the work of previous writers, but the best writing enriches that work, departs from it, transcends it, or even changes it, helping readers to see what came before in new ways. Writers on any subject need to know what others have said about the topic, and if they are to contribute to that conversation, they need to say something new…An original thinker moves the conversation forward by helping the participants see something new. A plagiarist pretends to be original and thereby risks holding the conversation back or even halting it altogether. For any conversation to become a true discussion, the speakers and listeners must be able to trust one another. Plagiarism breaks that trust…What is finally at stake, it seems to us, is that a relationship of trust exists between the reader and writer, and any deception or misrepresentation or dishonesty on the writer’s part - or the writers’ parts - violates that trust. Plagiarism, one form of this violation, is a serious offense, not first of all because it is stealing, but because it is dishonesty. Integrity is at stake.”
2 Files/reports will be maintained by the Provost for a period of at least five (5) years after the last date of the student’s enrollment or at least one (1) year after the student’s actual graduation, whichever last occurs.
Petition - Academic
Due to special or unique circumstances, a student may need to amend or alter the requirements within his/her academic program. The academic petition process provides the means for this kind of request and the petition itself serves as the official documentation for any such change that is approved. The process is as follows: 1) Obtain the Academic Petition Form from the Office of the Registrar. 2) Fill out the form according to the instructions and obtain the signature of the Chair of the Department involved in the request. 3) Return the signed form to the Office of the Registrar. Final approval will be granted through the Office of the Provost.
Registration
During the fall and spring semesters, enrolled students may preregister for the following academic semester. Programs of study are planned with the aid of advisers.
All students are expected to register on the days designated on the University calendar. Permission for late registration must come in advance from the Registrar. All late registrants pay a $20 fee. A new student may not register for classes until officially admitted to the University.
Academic Advising
Each student entering Malone University has the opportunity to meet with an adviser in the Center for Student Success (CSS) to plan and register for courses. As the student selects a major, a faculty adviser is assigned by CSS in that particular major. A student may elect to choose an adviser during the first semester at Malone; undeclared majors will continue to be advised through CSS. All requests for a change of adviser are processed through CSS and permissible if the adviser is a faculty person in the student’s major field of study. Each student must work with his/her adviser and have class schedules approved each semester. See Academic Advising Policy .
Adding Classes
During the first week of a semester, a student may add additional classes to his/her schedule by obtaining and completing a form supplied by the Office of the Registrar or the Center for Student Success. During the second week of a semester, the form must be signed by the instructor of the class. No classes may be added after the second week of a semester.
Class Load and Overloads
The normal academic year class load is 15-16 semester hours. A student enrolled for more than 16 semester hours is considered to be carrying an overload. A student must enroll for a minimum of 12 semester hours to be classified as full-time.
A student with a minimum cumulative gpa of 3.0 may register for more than 18 semester hours with permission of the Registrar.
A student living in a residence hall must carry at least 12 hours unless other arrangements have been approved by the Vice President for Student Development.
Course Level Policy
A student may not register for a class which is below the level of a course already passed or in which proficiency has been established. Students who do so will have the hours removed from their accumulation of hours so that they will not count toward graduation requirements. (This policy also applies to credit by examination - see above.)
Prerequisites
When prerequisite courses are required for entry into a course, it is expected that the enrolled student will make sure these requirements are fulfilled prior to entry into that course. During the registration process the Office of the Registrar will block students from registering for courses whose prerequisites have not been met. It is recommended that students and faculty advisers actively review student information during the advising process to make sure a registration delay does not occur due to missing prerequisites. In order to waive a prerequisite, a written request signed by the Chair or Program Director of the department or school housing the prerequisite course must be submitted to the Office of the Registrar.
Repeating a Course
Courses may be repeated at Malone in order to improve performance and to raise grades. The lower grade is not included in computing the cumulative grade point average. Permission is not normally granted to repeat a course by enrolling as a transient student at another college or university; however, when permission is granted, grades received are figured in the overall average as are the original grades. All entries remain a part of the student’s permanent academic record. A student must indicate that a course is being repeated at the time of registration. Forms are available in the Office of the Registrar.
Residency Requirement
To graduate, a student must complete at least thirty semester hours at Malone University. The 30 hours cannot be comprised in any part by Credit-for-Life-Experience or credit by examination.
At least twelve hours of one’s major must be completed at Malone. With the permission of the appropriate Department Chair/Program Director and the Provost, proficiency may be established by examination and the hour requirements modified. Not more than ten semester hours of transient study may be incorporated as part of the last thirty hours of a degree program, except in clinical laboratory science.
Second Degrees
A student desiring a second baccalaureate degree must complete a total of at least 154 hours. This represents at least thirty hours of additional work; twenty-four hours of this shall be done in residence. The student must also meet all the graduation requirements of each degree.
Standing - Academic
For purposes of continuation in the University, the cumulative grade point average is computed on all post-secondary work taken at Malone. Any student who does not meet the standard of minimum acceptable progress adopted by the Faculty will be placed on academic probation for the following semester.
All students must have an average of two quality points per semester hour on all work taken at Malone - the equivalent of a C average - as a minimum requirement for approval in a major and for graduation. In other words, an acceptable cumulative grade point average for all students is 2.0. However, students may progress to the requirement according to the following table:
Hours attempted Required gpa for good standing 1-19 1.70 20-39 1.80 40-59 1.90 60 or more 2.00 NOTE: The grade point averages in the above chart do not apply to students granted probational admission. A student granted probational admission should refer to the gpa expectation outlined in the terms of his/her enrollment contract.
Academic Probation
Probation is an emphatic warning to the student that the quality of work must improve if the student plans to graduate. When a student’s cumulative grade point average falls below 2.00 or, in the case of freshmen, below the standards described above the student will be placed on Academic Probation for the following semester. Students placed on academic probation are permitted to register for a maximum of 13 credits for each semester in which they are on academic probation. Exceptions can be granted only with the approval of the Registrar. Students on probation are advised to curtail extracurricular activities and work schedules.
Continuation on Academic Probation
The student who achieves satisfactory progress, but still falls below the minimum standard, will be continued on academic probation.
Removal from Academic Probation
A student will be removed from academic probation at the end of the semester that the cumulative grade point average is above the minimum.
Academic Suspension
Failure to achieve satisfactory progress during the probation semester will result in academic suspension, which implies complete separation from the University for at least the subsequent regular semester. The University may suspend any student who fails to earn at least a 1.0 gpa during any semester, regardless of classification or number of hours completed, or any student who is so indifferent or incompetent that neither the student nor University benefits.
A student suspended has the right to appeal the decision to the Admissions and Retention Committee.
Suspended students applying for re-admission must present evidence in support of the request.
Academic Dismissal
Any student who has been academically suspended two times will have Academic Dismissal recorded on the permanent record which implies complete and permanent separation from the University.
Student Records
Malone University has a policy of administering and maintaining student records which is in compliance with the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act of 1974. This policy provides students with certain rights of access to these educational records as delimited in FERPA. Directory information is subject to release by the University and includes the student’s name, local and permanent address, telephone listing, major, participation in officially recognized activities and sports, weight and height (if a member of an athletic team), dates of attendance, degrees and awards received, place of high school graduation, and most recent educational institution attended.
Students wishing to restrict access to directory information must file a written request with the Office of the Registrar. The complete policy concerning this Act is available upon request from the Office of the Registrar.
Transcripts
Transcripts of grades are sent from the Office of the Registrar only upon the written request of the student or legal notice requiring compliance. A student’s account in the Business Office and all other holds must be paid in full or cleared before the transcript will be released. Transcript charges are as follows:
- $7.90 for secure electronic transcript; $5.00 for paper transcript mailed via USPS
- $5.00 additional fee charged for expedited, same day, and/or authorized fax services
- $26.00 additional fee charged for next day via FedEx or similar mail service
Expedited Deadlines: Same Day - 2 p.m.; Next Day via FedEx - 11 a.m.
Transfer Policy
Statement of Transfer Practice
This policy statement is intended to serve as a guide for dealing with transfer, acceptance, and award of credit. “Transfer” as used here refers to the movement of students from one college, university, or other education provider to another and to the process by which credits representing educational experiences, courses, degrees, or credentials that are awarded by an education provider are accepted or not accepted by Malone University.
Inter-Institutional Transfer of Credit
Transfer of credit from one institution to Malone University involves at least three considerations:
- the educational quality of the learning experience which the student transfers;
- the comparability of the nature, content, and level of the learning experience to that offered by the receiving institution; and
- the appropriateness and applicability of the learning experience to the programs offered by the receiving institution, in light of the student’s educational goals.
Accredited Institutions
Accreditation speaks primarily to the first of these considerations, serving as the basic indicator that an institution meets certain minimum standards. Here at Malone, careful attention to the accreditation conferred by accrediting bodies recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) is used to determine the initial transferability of academic credit. CHEA has a formal process of recognition which requires that all accrediting bodies so recognized must meet the same standards. Under these standards, CHEA has recognized a number of accrediting bodies, including:
- regional accrediting commissions (which historically accredited the more traditional colleges and universities but which now accredit proprietary, vocational-technical, distance learning providers, and single-purpose institutions as well);
- national accrediting bodies that accredit various kinds of specialized institutions, including distance learning providers and freestanding professional schools; and
- professional organizations that accredit programs within multipurpose institutions.
Although accrediting agencies vary in the ways they are organized and in their statements of scope and mission, all accrediting bodies that meet CHEA’s standards for recognition function to ensure that the institutions or programs they accredit have met generally accepted minimum standards for accreditation.
Accreditation speaks to the probability, but does not guarantee, that students have met acceptable standards of educational accomplishment and thus allows Malone University to accept in transfer academic credit that meets our institutional transfer standard toward university programs.Comparability and Applicability
Comparability of the nature, content, and level of transfer credit and the appropriateness and applicability of the credit earned with programs offered by Malone, are as important in the evaluation process as the accreditation status of the institution at which the transfer credit is awarded. For those programs that do not hold a recognized status with CHEA, Malone University should have reasonable confidence that students from other institutions are qualified to undertake our educational program. It is through the articulation and transfer policies established by Malone that it determines the existence of valid evaluation measures, including third-party expert review to institutional effectiveness. Therefore, professional institutions in good standing with a State or National accreditation/licensure that are in line with programs or degrees offered at Malone, will be reviewed for transfer toward that program based on existing institutional credit transfers practices.
An example of this alternate comparability/applicability review: A student requesting to transfer academic credit from an institution that does not hold a CHEA recognized accreditation, but is recognized as in good standing with the Ohio Board of Nursing (OBN) and/or National League of Nursing (NLN), may have credits reviewed and transferred toward completion of the BSN degree at Malone University. Individual courses still must meet institutional and department standards, but the lack of a recognized CHEA accrediting body will not impede the review for transfer. The good standing of each institution will be evaluated annually to affirm an ongoing transfer of academic credit.
This review will be available for other programs that may hold third-party professional licensing as part of their professional practices.
The review process for these professional institutions requires that the Provost, Registrar, Vice President for Enrollment Management, Dean of School (from academic program where transfer of credit is sought), and Department Chair/Program Director (from academic program where transfer credit is sought) meet to evaluate the following information being presented: appropriate materials documenting the transferring student’s academic courses, the program’s academic content, and all external state and/or federal licensing or accrediting status of the issuing institution. Once approval is granted, the status of the approval is subject to annual review to assure Malone that the issuing institution is maintaining its approved status through external agencies.
Foreign Institutions
In most cases, foreign institutions are chartered and authorized to grant degrees by their national governments, usually through a Ministry of Education or similar appropriate ministerial body. No other nation has a system comparable with voluntary accreditation as it exists in the United States. Therefore, all foreign credentials and/or transcripts will be evaluated through the evaluation services approved/recommended by Malone University.
Institutional Transfer Credit Practice - Student Records
Every effort is made to correlate the work previously completed with the requirements for a degree from Malone. Transfer students must provide the official transcript from each institution attended beyond high school. These records become the property of Malone University and are considered a part of the student’s official file. Failure to report prior college or university attendance (including early admission) or to furnish official transcript(s) cancels all enrollment privileges.
- Transfer credit evaluation is tentative until official transcripts are received directly from the issuing institution and the evaluation is finalized through review of the official document(s).
- No student will be permitted to enroll until all official transcripts have been received. (Petitions for exceptions may be made to the Director of Admissions where delays are unavoidable due to transfers between semesters.)
- For students who transfer to Malone not having completed the AA, AS, BA, or BS degree, the average grade in courses allowed for transfer from each school must be 2.0 or higher (on a 4.0 scale). This means that for every grade of “D” accepted there must be another grade of at least “B” for an equal number of credits. Grades of “D-” and lower are not transferable. Students who have completed the degrees listed above will not be subject to the grade specific course requirements listed above for the transfer of courses applied to their General Education program and will be viewed as having completed GE requirements with the exception of Malone Foundational Courses (BIBL 100, THEO 211, and GEN 460). Malone Foundational Courses will be evaluated for all incoming students based on courses completed.
- Courses accepted in transfer will be recorded with the course number, title, and credit value; no grade point value will appear on the record and no grade point average will be calculated for the coursework listed. However, the grade point average for all coursework in the major (including transfer courses) will be calculated. The grade point average of all college or university work attempted will be used to determine graduation honors. (For further clarification, see Graduation Honors .)
- To graduate, a student must complete at least 30 graded semester hours at Malone University. These 30 semester hours cannot in any part include credit for extra-collegiate experiential learning or credit by examination. No rigid standard exists for the number of credits that can be transferred from regionally accredited two-year colleges, Bible colleges, liberal arts colleges, etc. The number of hours allowable may be different in each case, as determined by five variable considerations: (1) the kinds of courses presented; (2) the grades earned in each course; (3) the course of study pursued at Malone University; (4) the credit recommendations of the publication, “Transfer Credit Practices of Designated Educational Institutions” (pub., AACRAO) and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA); and (5) articulations and approved transfer practices for professional/licensure organizations approved through the review process outlined in the Statement of Transfer Practice.
Transient Work at Another College or University
Any Malone student with a cgpa of at least 2.0 who wishes to take coursework at another accredited institution of higher education must complete a form called the Request for Transient Certification. This form is used to verify that the course(s) in question will be acceptable at Malone. It is obtainable in the Office of the Registrar. Transient work at another college or university is NOT covered by financial aid. (See Repeating a Course for additional information - above.)
Tutorials
Any junior or senior needing a 300-400 level course which is not currently being offered may obtain forms in the Office of the Registrar and see the Department Chair/Program Director for permission to register for a tutorial. The following factors will govern the decisions, which will be made by the Department Chair/Program Director:
- the validity of need;
- the inability to substitute an offered course;
- the availability of a teacher;
- the student’s ability and willingness to meet the demands of independent study.
Withdrawals
Failure to attend class or merely giving notice to the instructor will not be regarded as official notice of withdrawal and will result in a student receiving a grade of F for the class or classes involved. The student must pay in full for classes which are not officially dropped.
Withdrawal from a course
Approved course withdrawals in the first 4 weeks are processed in the Office of the Registrar. (Instructor signature required after 2nd week.) Such withdrawals will not appear on the transcript. Tuition refunds are prorated according to withdrawal date (see Fee Payment Policies ). Beginning with the fifth week, all course withdrawals will appear as a grade of W (withdrawal) on the transcript. Such withdrawals must be approved by the course instructor with a recommendation from the student’s academic adviser. It remains the student’s responsibility to keep the academic advisers aware of such actions throughout the semester. Course withdrawals will not be approved after the ninth week of the semester except for unusual reasons such as extended illness. Exceptions must be approved by the Provost.
Courses offered on an accelerated basis or during a summer session may not be dropped after 3/5ths of the scheduled duration of the class. Exceptions must be approved by the Provost.
Withdrawal from the University
If a student must withdraw from all courses and leave the University, an official withdrawal form from the Office of the Registrar must be completed. This official withdrawal form must be approved, processed, and returned to the Office of the Registrar no later than one week prior to the course end date. No withdrawal will be approved or processed during the week of final examinations. (See Fee Payment Policies for refund policy.)
- After the submission of a faculty report in the Provost’s Office, the Provost may take either of the following actions:
- Faculty members are responsible for clearly communicating the Academic Integrity Policy to students. This is accomplished through two primary methods:
- submitting as one’s own work, part or all of an oral or written assignment which is copied, paraphrased, or purchased from another source, including world wide web and other online sources, without proper acknowledgement of that source. In written assignments, using three or more words in succession from a source without quotation marks and proper acknowledgement can be considered plagiarism.
- Plagiarism 1